Running head : Realistic Theory of EducationA Realist Theory of EducationMACROBUTTON NoMacro [Insert crab of Author (s ) here]MACROBUTTON NoMacro [Insert Institution information here] A Realist Theory of EducationThe early(prenominal) philosopher Aristotle once said that all men by temperament desire to know ADDIN EN .CITE Aristotle1924886AristotleW . D RossW . D RossMetaphys ics1070 pages121924OxfordOxford University Press75 (Aristotle , 1924 . In a adept , this desire to know is constituent(prenominal) of what it fashion to be a forgiving being . Two hearty misgivings pilfer send-off , Does it content to know and second , why does it emergence to know The answer to the first suspense is a matter of distrust . It is simply a matter of super virulent sense , so to speak . The answer to the second question h owever , is not merely a matter of intelligence . It requires critical thinking . It matters to us that we know because knowing has a practical or a pragmatic valueIt is with this idea that primordial may have a fuller understanding of the stub of tender beings acquisition of familiarity . That to seek knowledge is constitutive of what it center to be a human being and that knowledge has a practical or pragmatic value explains why thither is a felt need to develop theories of command . This had been the main labour of Philosophy of Education . This has a two-fold task first , it seeks to explicate a realist theory of education along with it philosophical motivations and underpinnings , and second , how a realist theory of education may suitably address significant issues in a well-favored and popular political settingAn initial disambiguation of the term pragmatism is required . In philosophy , realism is a meta somatogenic schooldays of thought . Meaning to say i t is concerned with fundamental ontology . I! ts perfume depression then is the very notion of reality itself . naive realism is the apparent horizon that reality and the objects within it such as trees and stones , etc . exists and that their founding has an independence from a mind that perceives them .
Reality exists independently of human representation , so to speak . buns Searle in his retain The Construction of Social Reality distinguishes between physical and neighborly facts . As Searle contends , the ontology of physical facts is different from the ontology of social facts ADDIN EN .CITE Searle1997666John R SearleThe Construction Of Social Rea lity256 pages1997Free Press94Engli sh (Searle , 1997 . He offers a accommodating characterization of realism when he writes : Reality exists independently of human representations . This view , called realism . is that though we have mental and lingual representations of the innovation in the form of beliefs , experiences , statements , and theories there is a sphere come to the fore there that is representations ADDIN EN .CITE SearleJohn R . SearleRationality and realness : What Is at stake ?DaedalusDaedalus3 (Searle , 1993 ,. 60 . Furthermore , as John Dolhenty contends : Knowledge is the baring of Reality . It is not a launching of our mind . The stripping of Reality is initially made by our external sense organs and then more perfectly by our agreement ADDIN EN .CITE Dolhenty5543John DolhentyA BRIEF ON THE perennial PHILOSOPHYAugust...If you want to pound a full essay, order it on our website: OrderCustomPaper.com< /a>
If you want to get a full essay, visit o! ur page: write my paper
No comments:
Post a Comment