“Bring Back Flogging” Response Paper Essay

In Jeff Jacobys essay, Bring keister Flogging, he strongly reveals his opinions and beliefs on material penalty. Jacoby illustrates the use of verbal irony and sarcasm. He applies verbal irony and sarcasm in such a way that by reading what is written is easily understood to interpret what he really means. Jacoby describes what beat is, how it was helpful, and argues that walloping needs to be brought linchpin to our society. After reading Jacobys personal credit line for bringing back the harsh whipstitch and whipping, called trounce, I see that flogging would be helpful if it is brought back.Flogging is exercising the perform of brutal thrashings and whippings. Flogging has been practiced by the Puritans in 1632, all the way to 1972 when it was repealed. The Puritans acted in flogging when offenders were sentenced for breakting a curse, such as adultery or blaspheme. When convicted of the curse an singular committed, they were tied to a post in universe, with no sh irt, and severely flogged. By practicing flogging, and displaying the beating to the citizens of the town, the citizens could see what would be done for their penalization if they commit the same or contrasting crime.If flogging were to be brought back and routinely practiced on offenders of certain crimes, and the beating was displayed to the public, it could greatly take crimes committed. Being whipped is non any more or little degrading that being locked in a cage, like an animal. Bringing back flogging would inspire possible criminals not to commit a crime that they could be planning. By being whipped in public, the offender entrusting be highly embarrassed and boast severe trouble oneself. Hopefully this felling of embarrassment and the pain experienced will stay with them, if they judge of committing another crime. Also, after beaten the wounds will turn to scars, these would serve as a permanent reminders of the resultants obtained from their actions.Prisons ar p acked tightly with hundreds of criminals. Some prisoners are violent offenders and others are not. Providing meals, building new jails, keeping a prison running, and providing prisoners with necessities, is very expensive. If flogging was the consequence of committing crimes, the money spent in and for prisons, could be used for other and more of import items, such as books for school systems. In addition, less dangerous offenders will not be abused or ransacked in prison. The practice of flogging would withal increase prison space for more dangerous offenders.Bringing back the punishment of flogging would greatly reduce crimes committed. Also, the public display, pain, and the permanent reminder from scars, will reduce the possibility of participating in the crime again. It would too serve as a physical image to others of what will fall if they commit a crime. Puritan forefathers had an brilliant idea of punishment for committing crimes. Flogging was also a very effective punishment. The acquaintance of what will happen if a crime is committed, and knowing how painful it is, will deliver individuals to think thoroughly if they ever define they want to commit a crime. I vote to bring back flogging