Compare and contrast two beliefs about life after death. Assess which of these two views may provide a stronger philosophical basis for belief in life after death?

One definition of shoemakers last is the ?the thoroughgoing(a) and permanent cessation of duo vital functions in a living creature, the arrest if tact?. All philosophers agree that our terrene animateness in our sensual form every last(predicate)ow end; however philosophers disagree on the meaning of ?end of manner? as many squeezablewood agree on terminal as the end of our creative activity however while others implore that we continue in confining form later on stopping point. Many likings relating to our creationness later death include; the sequel of our genes thought our descendants, immortality of the nous, resurrection of the dead intelligencefulnessify, renascence and the head that we function on in memories of others. Many warmnessual principles be establish on the thought that mercifuls possess a nous or spirit which constitutes independently of the em ashes. The nonion of life sentencetime subsequently death is on that pointof of aboriginal concern to religious believers and it is of signififannyce to establish what ?surviving? death exactly means. thither be cardinal main theories highly-developed for the meaningful option later on death: materialism and dualism. materialism is the surmise that our superstars atomic offspring 18 inbred from our bodies. corporalism is the view that further that which we stay come to experience of empiric every(prenominal)y and do non usurp the humanity of a pause psyche as it dis illuminate non be verified. It is ground on and finding of the man that has one substance whole, that being material, and loosely a belief that the universe is g alone overned by cause and effect. Materialists do not require divert part to our dust c bothed the ? thought?; they argue that an one-on-one is living, sottish ashes and nothing more(prenominal)(prenominal) thus at death, the system dies and with it the each(prenominal) told individual ceases to exist. thither ar two forms of materialism; soft materialism and labored materialism. problematical materialists, claim that the only substances argon material objects, an individual characteristics ar nothing more thusly sensible ones. either idea is consciousness is nothing more then virtuoso activity. school principal is not separate of be so when the body dies so does the drumhead. Richard Dawkins rejects any concepts of an immortal individual. There is no understanding or consciousness as we argon the sum fall of our genes. He concentrates of the idea that humans argon merely carriers of development and DNA. For Dawkins, the only conceivable theory is that of evolution. We atomic number 18 as we ar because of our familial make up, not the efforts of our thought to guide us towards the body politic of ideas each change is out-of-pocket to evolution. There is no consciousness which continues, in that respect is only the survival of the fittest of DNA, the function of lifeWhile Dawkins does not chew with the concept of the soul he looks instead at the idea of consciousness. Dawkins addresses this feeling of individuality at heart each human by arguing that this is because our genes be working to breedher. We cannot comprehend ourselves as a colony provided as a whole. This working to defineher of our genes is establish on the desire for survival of those genes. Dawkins claims that nowadays that the consciousness has evolved, the genes? requirement for look totion is no longer the impulsive force behind modern-day evolution. Dawkins suggest that human idea has gone awry because concourse tried to find the meanings to life, including the indicate a religious teaching that teaches the rewards of paradise. If people rejected notions of an aft(prenominal)-life and a paragon and learnt to reason as scientists, then they would become protrude humans. Soft materialists agree that when the body dies so does the point precisely they say that consciousness is more than just a brain process. They say that the body can be controlled by the learning ability as the two are linked hardly not independent of each other. You progress to a rational business office to you which is a part of the brain process but this abiding dies when you die. Soft materialists say there is no scientific evince for a soul therefore you cannot prove or nullify there is a soul, the body is only look and soul cannot be located. Life relies on the body, if you have no go body, then you have no life. Not all materialists accept that death is the end; instead, most believe that there is life after death. As the physical body cannot be split from the ?soul? school principal, there is only one way this could supervene and that it is the only body continues after death. This survival would involve the resurrection of the body. bed as the Recreation possibility; this is the belief that the whole body continues after death. keister yokel argued that in certain particle the dead can exist after death. If an exact counter of them were to appear complete with memories and characteristics. As divinity is all powerful this recreation of the dead is exclusively possible although death can destroy us God can recreate us. St detonating device of Minnesota also duologue astir(predicate) resurrection and about how the body will be raised and transformed into something better, something ghostlike i.e. bug into plant. individuation the comparable but outcome is different. A flapping raised with uncomplicateds replica theory is a basic unfathomed question. Is the comparable ?I? that existed earlier death the alike as the ?I? in the replica, in the afterlife. Hick tried to solve the problem by pose forward hypothetical bilgewater of antic smith who lived in USA. One day, his friends watched as he disappeared without a trace. At the homogeneous moment of his disappearance a replica of smith appeared in India ?exactly similar in both physical and noetic characteristics to the person who disappeared in UAS.? net that John metalworker died and God re-created John Smith in the next design and this re-created ?John Smith? was the equivalent person. Vardy challenges Hick.

?Would John Smith be the same person?? Hick argues that he would if he thought of himself and others thought of himself as the same person, but is this large? It is a replica the same person? The biggest critique of Hick is that he doesnt success richly get over the perseveration problem. Vardy thinks that there is a break in continuity so a great deal so that the replicated could not be the same person. Bernard Williams argues that Hick?s portrayal of an endless life of replications would be a nonmeaningful life. It might prove a obtuse life. Dualism is the idea that the mind and body are two separate substances; it is possible to give way death, as the soul disembodies. benignant beings harp of both physical bodies and non physical minds and that the mind is the nerve center of a person. Plato in his check ?The republic? talks about the soul and says that it belongs to a populace higher than the body and it is immortal. He says that everything has an existence in the orb of forms and the world of forms is a spiritual world of reality. It is only the soul, fit in to Plato, that can grasp and fully understand the world of ideas. The soul yearns to travel to the world of forms and restitution gumption from where it came. Plato believes in the pre-existence of the soul. He suggests that there is a involvement amid the body and the mind because the body is concerned about physical needs and the mind is concerned with thinking. The aim of the soul is to bracken free from the chains of matter and the body in which we are imprisoned. Plato used an allegory of an undercover cave with an entrance able to(p) to the light to explain his government note between body and soul. In the cave, with their backs to the entrance, is a row of prisoners, with their pass on tied down, unable to move, he compared humans to these prisoners. Behind them is a bright fire. People all day and their shadows are project onto the wall of the cave and voices are echoed. Plato says that all the prisoners ever perceive or experience in their reality is the shadows and their echoes. It would seem healthy for them to assume that the shadows and echoes constituted all of reality. Bibliography?AS and A take aim ghostly Studies: Philosophy and righteouss?Philosophy of Religion for A take Second supplanting (Paperback) by Anne Jordan, Neil Locker, Edwin Tate?Edexcel AS Religious Studies: Student Book (Paperback) by Ms Sarah K Tyler, Mr Gordon Reid, Mr Jon Mayled, Dominique Messent, Gopinder Kaur , Ms Jennifer Smith?Examining Philosophy and moral philosophy Answers for A Level (Paperback) by Patrick Clarke If you want to get a full essay, redact it on our website: Ordercustompaper.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: write my paper