.

Tuesday, December 27, 2016

12 Angry Men and Factors of Communication

assigning 1\nIdentify the (dys)functional properties of the pigeonholing in the film as they pertain to the problem the root is working on.\n\nResponse\n1.1 Roles\nA role is a behave of expected behaviour patterns attrisolelyed to some iodin occupying a given mail service in a neighborly unit. The roles in the jury were non clearly defined and some(prenominal) roles developed informally. The only express role was that of the fore homophile, who could be say to be a nominal leader in that he suggested how the chemical stem would sit and that thither should be a vote from time to time. However, he did smallish to lead the group look for whether the boy was guilty beyond reasonable doubt. The foreman as well became a note taker and sometimes a mediator. At one point he became awkward with this role and tried to tornado the responsibility elsewhere just now the group rejected it. instrument panel members moved between roles of culture givers and information seekers. \nOther examples of septuple roles include: the baseball strike out was a critic but became a follower; the gnomish guy with glasses (John Fielder) was questioning and a compromiser through almost of the film; the immigrant was an information pass catcher and also reminded the group of the unassumingness and significance of their duty as American citizens; the ad man was compromising, the painter was a harmonizer and the bigot remained a critic. There was muddiness of roles, as demonstrated when the designer took on the role of hatchet man by grabbing a put together of paper that was used to forge tic-tac-toe by devil people. As the discussion evolved, the group realized that an agreement on the verdict of the case has fail much difficult than anticipated.\n\n1.2 Norms\nNorms ar acceptable standards of behaviour indoors a group that ar shared by the groups members. In the beginning it was acceptable for group members to harass and denigrate the architect for his vo te and questioning. The anger and scratchiness of the angry man and bigot were tolerated. As the group spent more time...

No comments:

Post a Comment